What Incarnatus writes below is well said, and far be it from me to underestimate the disgust that long-term contact with the machinery of government can create in even the sweetest of souls…. But wouldn’t the problem be the same with any bureaucracy anywhere? Isn’t the issue really one of human nature and human corruption? I think the search for a “sane” government (in the sense he means) short of the New Jerusalem is a Romanticism, rather like the Romantic desire for King Arthur’s return (C.S. Lewis in one of the Narnia books: “And I say, the sooner the better!”), but more tantalizingly achievable in theory.
And though Gen. Lee was a great soldier and a great man, he was no prophet in this case. I think that our vast republic–vaster now!–is, though far from perfect, neither “aggressive abroad” nor “despotic at home.” At home we enjoy more liberty than is good for our souls, most likely…and on the world stage, our economy has been the greatest engine of prosperity and our military the greatest guarantor of peace and stability of the past 100 years–for everyone else in the world! Our current state of heightened conflict notwithstanding (or perhaps I should say: “included.”) So I’m sorry, but I have to give at least 2 1/2 cheers for our “regime” as it is…
As a peace offering, however, let me state that if King Arthur does return soon I’d be happy to have him take over. I would also accept Alfred the Great, Charlemagne, Louis IX of France (as Sec’y of State), and Queen Elizabeth I (as long as she’d reopen the monasteries her dad closed). So I do have a little flexibility on this monarchy thing.