For, among other things, his defense of Russell Kirk.
See as well the comments of Boyd Cathey:
…His [Russell Kirk's] intent was not to create a symmetrical ideology, but rather to illustrate that a belief in and devotion to inherited Norms ran through the thoughts and writings of various post-French Revolutionary personnages, and that these thoughts, writings, poetry, etc. were illustrative of a worldview that was both Christian and organic. Rejection of these Norms has led to the disasters we’ve seen and experienced in modern life and in society. Paul Gottfried understands that, and his response to Professor Wolfe is on target and well stated.