A Definition for Anglicanism

…from A Conservative Blog for Peace.

For all that has been said about Buckley and his subversion of the conservative movement, his comments about Anglicanism (at least the official flavor) are on target:

Can anybody from the Pope to Mao Tse-Tung be absolutely sure he is not an Anglican?

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 17th, 2007 at 8:21 pm and is filed under Blogger 1. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “A Definition for Anglicanism”

  1. incarnatus Says:
    July 17, 2007 at 8:23 pm | Reply

    Not sure what’s up with the dotted line boxes?

  2. amede Says:
    July 20, 2007 at 5:10 am | Reply

    Don’t sweat it–I think they’re stylish

  3. James Fulford Says:
    July 23, 2007 at 3:36 pm | Reply

    In fact, Buckley was simply quoting Auberon Waugh

    “In England, we have a curious institution called the Church of England…. Its strength has always been in the fact that on any moral or political issue it can produce such a wide divergence of opinion that nobody — from the Pope to Mao Tse-tung — can say with any confidence that he is not an Anglican. Its weaknesses are that nobody pays much attention to it and very few people attend its functions.”

    –Auberon Waugh

  4. incarnatus Says:
    July 24, 2007 at 1:24 am | Reply

    Many thanks Mr. Fulford for the citation and as well for the work you do at VDARE.

Leave a Reply